Badiaa A. Ali1 and Mohamed E. Megahed2
1Department of Animal Production and Fish Resources, Faculty of Agriculture, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
2National Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, Gulfs of Suez and Aqaba’s branch, Suez, Egypt.
The aim of this study was to determine the influence of different sources of carbon with and without addition of probiotics on growth performance, and feed utilization of Indian white shrimp (Fenneropenaeus indicus), in addition to water quality of biofloc production system. Control diet (35% CP), in addition to eight treatments based on partial and complete substitution of artificial feeds were used. The biofloc used in the treatments were collected from different reactors with different carbon source (Corn flour and Barley flour) with and without probiotics addition. The experiment lasted for 28 days. At the end of the experiment, the results indicated that there were significant differences between treatments in growth performance and feed utilization. The highest survival was shown by the shrimp fed with barley flour fed biofloc without probiotics and control treatments (100 ± 0.0%), while the lowest survival was shown by the shrimp fed with corn flour fed biofloc with probiotics (54 ± 1.0%). The highest specific growth rate was obtained in the control treatment (1.66 ± 0.02%) while, the shrimp fed with biofloc from barley flour carbon source without probiotics showed almost similar specific growth rate (1.61± 0.02) to that of the control treatment. The biofloc fed shrimp showed promising growth values indicating that the biofloc was sufficient for supporting shrimp growth under commercial farming conditions. Hence, the overall experiments allow concluding that based on its nutritional value; the biofloc offers an alternative strategy for an efficient use of nutrient input in aquaculture systems.
Anand, P.S , S. Kumar, M.P. Kohli, K.J. Sundarat, A. Sinha, G.H. Pailan and S.D. Roy (2017). Dietary biofloc supplementation in black tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon: effects on immunity, antioxidant and metabolic enzyme activities. Aquculture research 48, issue 8, 4512-4523.
APHA (2005) . Standard Methods for the Examination of the Water and Wastewat (21 st ed., 1220 p), W ashington, DC: American Public Health Association.
AOAC (2019). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official Methods ofAnalysis. Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Azim, M.E., D.C. Little, and J.E. Bron (2007). Microbial protein production in activated suspension tanks manipulating C/N ratio in feed and implications for fish culture. Bioresource Technology 99, 3590 – 3599.
Burford, M.A., P.J. Thompson, R.P. McIntosh, R.H.Bauman, and D.C. Pearson (2004).The contribution of flocculated material to shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) nutrition in a high-intensity, zeroexchange system. Aquaculture 232, 525–537.
Cohen, J.M., T.M. Samocha, J.M. Fox, R.L.Gandy and A.L. Lawrence ( 2005).Characterization of water quality factors during intensive raceway production of juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei using limited discharge and biosecure management tools. Aquaculture Engineering 32, 425– 442.
Coutteau, P. and P. Sorgeloos (1995). Intercalibration exercise on the qualitative and quantitative analysis of fatty acids in Artemia and marine samples used in mariculture. ICES Cooperative Research Report, N° 211, 30.
Crab, R., Y. Avnimelech, T. Defoirdt, P. Bossier and W. Verstraete (2007). Nitrogen removal in aquaculture towards sustainable production. Aquaculture 270, 1-4.
Crab, R., B. Chielens, M. Wille,P. Bossier and W. Verstraete (2010). The effect of different carbon sources on the nutritional value of bioflocs, a feed for Macrobrachium rosenbergii postlarvae. Aquaculture Research 41, 559– 567.
Cuzon, G., L. Addison, G. Gaxiola, C. Rosas and J. Guillaume (2004). Nutrition of Litopenaeus vannamei reared in tank or in ponds. Aquaculture, 235, 513-551.
Duncan, M.B. (1955). Multiple ranges and multiple F-tests. Biometrics, 11:1-42.
El Sayed, A.F.M. (1999). Alternative dietary protein sources for farmed tilapia, Oreochromis spp. Aquaculture. 179, 149 – 168.
Emerenciano, M., E. L Ballester,., R. O. Cavalli,., and W. Wasielesky ( 2012). Biofloc technology application as a food source in a limited water exchange nursery system for pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus brasiliensis (Latreille, 1817). Aquaculture Research, 43, 3: 447– 457.
FAO (2001). Evaluation of Health and Nutritional Properties of Powdered Milk and Live Lactic Acid Bacteria. Expert Consultation Report. FAO, Rome.
FAO (2003). Health management and biosecurity maintenance in white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) hatcheries in Latin America. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 450. Rome, FAO. 64p.
Hernández-Llamas A., J. Cabanillas-Ramos and F.J. Magalló-Barajas(2016). Estimating impact of white spot disease on economic risk in semi-intensive shrimp farms in Mexico: the case of the State of Sinaloa.Rev. Aquacult., 8 (2), 111-120.
Hostins, G., O. Lara, D.E. Decamp, W. Cesar and J.R. Wasielesky (2017). Efficacy and variations in bacterial density in the gut of Litopenaeus vannamei reared in a BFT system and in clear water supplemented with a commercial probiotic mixture. Aquaculture, 480, 58-64.
Ju, Z.Y., I. Forster, L. Conquest, W. Dominy, W.C. Kuo and F.D. Horgen (2008) Determination of microbial community structures of shrimp floc cultures by biomarkers and analysis of floc amino acid profiles. Aquaculture Research 39 (2), 118 – 133.
Khanjani, M.H., M.M. Sajjadi, M. Alizadeh and I. Sourinejad (2016). Nursery performance of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei, Boone, 1931) cultivated in a biofloc system: the effect of adding different carbon sources. Aquaculture Research, 1–11, doi:10.1111/are.12985.
Krummenauer, D., L. Poersch, L.A. Romano, G.R. Lara, P. Encarnação and Jr. W. Wasielesky( 2014). The effect of probiotics in a Litopenaeus vannamei biofloc culture system infected with Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J. Appl. Aquacult. 26 (4), 370–379.
Kuhn, D.D., G.D. Boardman, S.R. Craig, G.J. Flick and E. McLean (2008). Use of microbial flocs generated from tilapia effluent as a nutritional Supplement for shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei in recirculating aquaculture systems. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 39, 72-82.
Megahed, M.E. and K. Mohamed (2014). Sustainable growth of shrimp aquaculture through biofloc production as alternative to fishmeal in shrimp feeds. J. Agric. Sci. 6:176-188.
Megahed, M. E., G. Elmesiry, A. Ellithy, and K. Mohamed (2018). Genetic, nutritional and pathological investigations on the effect of feeding low protein diet and biofloc on growth performance, survival and disease prevention of Indian white shrimp Fenneropenaeus indicus. Aquaculture International 26:589.- 615 .doi:10.1007/s10499-017-0231-1.
Panigrahi, A. , S. Chakrapani, S. Rajasekar, J. S. Dayal and G. Chavali (2018). Effect of carbon and nitrogen ratio (C:N) manipulation on the production performance and immunity of Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei (Boone, 1931) in a biofloc‐based rearing system. Aquaculture Research, 50:1. 29 -41
Putra, R. I., M. Rusliadi, U. M. Fauzi, Z. Tang and A. Muchlisin (2017). Growth performance and feed utilization of African catfish Clarias gariepinus fed a commercial diet and reared in the biofloc system enhanced with probiotic F1000 Research, 6 , 1545.
Ringo, E., E. O. Joser, L.G. Vecino, S. Wadsworth and S. Song (2012). Use of immunostimulants and nucleotides in aquaculture: a review. Journal of Marine Science Research Development, 2:1– 22.
Ray, A.J., B. L. Lewis, C. L. Browdy and J. W. Leffler (2010). Suspended solids removal to improve shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) production and an evaluation of a plant‐based feed in minimal exchange, super- intensive culture systems. Aquaculture, 299: 89– 98.
Samocha, T.M., A. L. Lawrence, C. A. Collins, F.L. Castille, W.A. Bray, C. J. Davies, P.G. Lee and G. F. Wood (2004). Production of the Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, in high density greenhouse enclosed raceways using low salinity groundwater. Journal of Applied Aquaculture, 15:1– 19.
SAS (2000). Statistical Analysis Systems program Ver. 6. 12, SAS Institute Incorporation. Cary. NC 27513, USA.
Serra, F.P., C.A. Gaona, P.S. Furtado, L. H. Poersch and J. R. Wasielesky (2015). Use of different carbon sources for the biofloc system adopted during the nursery and grow-out culture of Litopenaeus vannamei Aquacult.Int., 23, 1325-1330.
Vargas-Albores, F., M. A. Porchas-Cornejo, M. Martínez-Porchas , E. Villalpando-Canchola, T. Gollas-Galván and L.R. Martínez-Córdova (2017). Bacterial biota of shrimp intestine is significantly modified by the use of a probiotic mixture: a high throughput sequencing approach Helgoland Mar. Res., 71: 5. /doi.org/10.1186/s10152-017-0485-z
Verschuere, l., G. Rombaut, P. Sorgeloos and W. Verstraete (2000). Probiotic bacteria as biological control agents in aquaculture. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 64: 655 – 671.
Vinatea, l., A.O. Galvez, C.L. Browdy, A. Stokes, J. Venero, J. Haveman, B.L. Lewis, A. Lawson, A. Shuler and J.W. Leffler (2010). Photosynthesis, water respiration and growth performance of Litopenaeus vannamei in a super - intensive raceway culture with zero water exchange: interaction of water quality variables. Aquacultural Engineering, 42: 17– 24.
Wasielesky, Jr., W. H. Atwood, A. Stokes and C. L. Browdy (2006). Effect of natural production in a zero exchange suspended microbial floc based super-intensive culture system for white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquaculture, 258: 396 – 403.